Home | About | Issues | Documents| Media | Links | Chat | Blog | Interactive Constitution | Contact Us

Archive for the ‘9/11’ Category

President Bush was expected to sign detailed plans for a worldwide war against al-Qaida two days before Sept. 11 but did not have the chance before the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, U.S. and foreign sources told NBC News

Monday, February 15th, 2010

WASHINGTON, May 16, 2002 – President Bush was expected to sign detailed plans for a worldwide war against al-Qaida two days before Sept. 11 but did not have the chance before the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, U.S. and foreign sources told NBC News.

The document, a formal National Security Presidential Directive, amounted to a “game plan to remove al-Qaida from the face of the earth,” one of the sources told NBC News’ Jim Miklaszewski.

The plan dealt with all aspects of a war against al-Qaida, ranging from diplomatic initiatives to military operations in Afghanistan, the sources said on condition of anonymity.

In many respects, the directive, as described to NBC News, outlined essentially the same war plan that the White House, the CIA and the Pentagon put into action after the Sept. 11 attacks. The administration most likely was able to respond so quickly to the attacks because it simply had to pull the plans “off the shelf,” Miklaszewski said.

The United States first would have sought to persuade other countries to cooperate in the campaign by sharing intelligence and using their law enforcement agencies to round up al-Qaida suspects.

The plans also called for a freeze on al-Qaida financial accounts worldwide and a drive to disrupt the group’s money laundering. The document mapped out covert operations aimed at al-Qaida cells in about 60 counties.

In another striking parallel to the war plan adopted after Sept. 11, the security directive included efforts to persuade Afghanistan’s Taliban government to turn al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden over to the United States, with provisions to use military force if it refused.

Plan was ready to go
Officials did not believe that Bush had had the opportunity to closely review the document in the two days between its submission and the Sept. 11 attacks. But it had been submitted to national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, and the officials said Bush knew about it and had been expected to sign it.

The couching of the plans as a formal security directive is significant, Miklaszewski reported, because it indicates that the United States intended a full-scale assault on al-Qaida even if the Sept. 11 attacks had not occurred.

Such directives are top-secret documents that are formally drafted only after they have been approved at the highest levels of the White House, and represent decisions that are to be implemented imminently.

Such a directive would normally be approved with the president’s knowledge by his Principals Committee, which in Bush’s White House includes Rice, Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and CIA Director George Tenet, among other senior administration officials.

Source: New World Order Report

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon

Truth Squad: 9-11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it’s job

9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public

9/11 Hero Remembers WTC7

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

An interview from WeAreChangeBoston titled “New September 11th First Responders Testimony. Recorded 8/11/09? prompted “9/11 Hero Remembers WTC7?. Raising some important questions, this 9/11 first responder bravely shares his experience.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uSiBXEHats

A big thanks to WeAreChangeBoston for finding this gentleman. Please respect his request to not be contacted. If you wish to contact this brave man he requested that messages not be sent to him directly at this time. (email wearechangeboston@gmail and messages will be forwarded) Research the sources below for more information and watch the original, entire interview.
Visit:
http://WeAreChange.org
http://FeelGoodFoundation.com
This video was put together as a free educational tool for use in an outdoor/noisy setting.

Source: InfoWars

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

FBI wants records kept of Web sites visited

9/11 – The Reality In Pictures

We Are Change Boston Gives Fox News’s Carl Cameron WTC Nano Thermite Evidence News Tip

Team Obama to double budget for treating 9/11 responders in an amazing same-day U-turn

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

The White House revealed Thursday night it boosted funding for ailing 9/11 responders – pumping more money into the treatment program than ever before.

Team Obama disclosed the cash only after outraging New York lawmakers with the news that the administration won’t back a permanent plan to help the dying Ground Zero responders.

The White House confirmed it will more than double the budget for treating ill responders to $150 million in 2011.

The abrupt revelation came after the Daily News reported New York lawmakers were shocked Wednesday when Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the administration does not support mandatory funding for the $11 billion permanent treatment plan.

“I was stunned – and very disappointed,” said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

“To say the least, I was flabbergasted,” said Staten Island Rep. Mike McMahon.

Family members also were infuriated by the lack of permanent support. “I thought that these people would be taken care of. I would have expected better from this administration,” said Lorie Van Auken.

The delegation hopes President Obama will reconsider and put victims of the terror strike on a footing close to wounded soldiers, perhaps even funding the 9/11 health bill with the military.

“We are focused on strengthening the World Trade Center health program and providing needed resources through the budget,” White House spokeswoman Moira Mack said.

New York legislators were thrilled to learn of the one-year funding boost.

“I am so pleased the administration heard the concerns of my colleagues and I,” said McMahon, praising the belated payout during a tough budget.

Lawmakers still believe a permanent fix needs to be made so responders don’t have to take hat in hand for every new budget and political cycle.

Sebelius “made it clear that the administration does not support any kind of funding mechanism that’s built into the bill,” said Bronx Rep. Eliot Engel. “They find money for everything else, they need to find money for this.”

Source: NY Daily News

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

Relatives of 9/11 victims ask appeals court to move Ground Zero debris from landfill to burial site

Brown stands by supporting a tax-subsidized golf course over 9/11 rescue workers.

9/11 – The Reality In Pictures

9/11 – The Reality In Pictures

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

We Are Change Boston Gives Fox News’s Carl Cameron WTC Nano Thermite Evidence News Tip

Brown stands by supporting a tax-subsidized golf course over 9/11 rescue workers.

Why Did We Lose Our Rights if the Government Isn’t Even Keeping Us Safe?

We Are Change Boston Gives Fox News’s Carl Cameron WTC Nano Thermite Evidence News Tip

Friday, January 22nd, 2010


I briefly met Carl Cameron at the Martha Coakley for Senate rally with president Obama on 1/17/10. Carl Cameron has done some great investigative reporting about 9/11. Some of this footage can be seen for free in Jason Bermas’s documentary “Fabled Enemies” via youtube or the web.
This link should work for the full film in high quality:

You can also purchase a copy of this film @ InfoWars.com .
Here is a candid video We Are Change Minnesota made with Carl Cameron:
Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron shares his views on 9/11 saying, “its really hard to make the case that the buildings just imploded without some sort of an accelerant,” and that We Are Change Minnesota is, “right to bang the drum because we dont know,” what really happened on 9/11.
(Warning: Explicit language)

http://mnchange.org/carl-cameron-supports-questioning-911
I wanted to encourage Carl Cameron to continue doing great investigative reporting. By video taping him receiving the Nano Thermite document Im hoping that Fox and other news show may report on this story. The Nano Thermite paper can be found @ AE911Truth.org or via this direct link: www.ae911truth.org/events/aia-convention/7TOCPJ.pdf
Please stay tuned to my YouTube channel by subscribing for more videos that will be released soon.
If you are in Boston and you want to help out you can contact We Are Change Boston via:
youtube.com/wearechangeboston , myspace.com/mark_er, facebook.com/markedup or WeAreChangeBoston@gmail.com .

Source: Federal Jack

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

O’Reilly demands ‘deranged’ Bush heckler be arrested

AL GORE CONFRONTED ON CLIMATEGATE IN CHICAGO

Truth Squad: 9-11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it’s job

Brown stands by supporting a tax-subsidized golf course over 9/11 rescue workers.

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

State Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA), the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate special election on Tuesday, voted on Oct. 17, 2001 to deny financial aid to Red Cross rescue workers who had volunteered with 9/11 recovery efforts. As a state representative at the time, Brown was one out of only three legislators who had opposed the overwhelmingly bipartisan measure. As ThinkProgress reported on Saturday, at the same time Brown was voting against the 9/11 rescue workers bill, he sponsored House Bill 4423, a measure to provide a tax-subsidized bond to build a golf course in Newport, a town in his district. Brown, earlier this weekend, told ThinkProgress that he opposed the rescue worker money because of the state’s fiscal condition and because he had his own “priorities.” Given the revelation that Brown fought for a golf course over the rescue worker aid, ThinkProgress again approached Brown for comment today:

TP: Mr. Brown, in 2001 when you voted against financial aid for 9/11 rescue workers, you were pushing a bill for a tax subsidized golf course in your district. Can you explain that?

BROWN: I’m not sure what you’re referring to. [...]

TP: Are you going to explain that vote?

BROWN: Number two, we were in a financial difficulty and we couldn’t afford it unfortunately.

TP: But you could afford a tax-subsidized bond for a golf course?

BROWN: We had to obviously take care of the people of Massachusetts who needed to stay employed.

Watch it:

Brown’s golf course bill passed on November 30, 2001, a few weeks after he voted to kill the 9/11 rescue worker financial aid. While the golf course construction certainly kept people employed, Brown’s self-professed interest in protecting the American homeland doesn’t extend to the rescue workers who rushed to the site of the twin towers after the attacks of 9/11.

Source: Think Progress

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all ‘conspiracy theorists’

Why Whole-Body Imaging Won’t Work

More Surveillance Can Make Us Less Safe

I’m a Truther… I’m a Republocrat

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9 /11 Truth Movement

Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all ‘conspiracy theorists’

The New World Order Is Taking Over the Patriot and Truth Movements

From 9/11 Conspiracy to 911 Dispatch: Photos of Charlie Sheen & Brooke at conspiracy conference

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

Charlie Sheen and his wife of two years Brooke Mueller have been all over the news since Mueller’s infamous 911 call, made on Christmas morning.  Mueller was  spotted out in Aspen the day after the incident. Earlier this week, RadarOnline published an “exclusive” claiming  “Charlie Sheen Wife Was Pressured To Recant, Will File For Divorce” then published another “exclusive” stating “Charlie Sheen Says He And Wife Won’t Divorce”. The next headline read‘Sheen Strikes Back, Says Wife Made Up Story Out Of Anger’. Earlier this year the New York Daily News claimed that Brooke Muellerwas “jealous of Sheen’s ex-wife Denise Richards”.

The cop who arrested Charlie Sheen is an ‘interesting’ character, to put it nicely. An aspiring artist, the officer was investigated for writing letters to Osama bin Laden, boasts about hiring illegal immigrants on his website, admitted using drugs while an officer, and was criticized for committing a lewd act in public.

The last time Sheen was in the news before he and  Mueller became embroiled in their painfully public spectacle was when he released his Twenty Minutes with the President letter to Obama regarding the questionable events of 9/11/01 . It was covered on national and local news, including radio in Los Angeles.

In better days, Charlie and Brooke were seen in this impromptu lighthearted interview outside Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas. It wasn’t always fun and games though; Charlie is a serious person and researcher who has been involved in what’s known as the 9/11 Truth Movement for several years. Sheen has several big name celebrities accompanying him in the search for truth, including Jesse VenturaWillie Nelson, and Ed Asner. Fellow actor Daniel Sunjata wrote a column supporting Sheen’s call for answers last month. Anti war activist and MASH star Mike Farrell told me he does not believe it’s a conspiracy, though, and he questions the motives of those who advocate such a position. Nevertheless, it is a serious undertaking to question the establishment in such a serious way, and it involves some degree of risk. I commend Charlie Sheen for having the courage and conviction to not only do the research, but to speak out publicly for this cause, which I also support.

Many people don’t know that Martin Sheen, Charlie’s father and a man whose Catholic faith inspires his activism, has also questioned the events of 9/11. He was interviewed by We Are Change L.A. at an anti war rally on 10/27/07 and expressed some concern about the official story, particularly WTC 7 and the way it came down as if in a controlled demolition.

Charlie had previously gotten coverage worldwide when he first went public with his 9/11 questionsin 2006.  In the aftermath of that media barrage, Sheen and Mueller attended Alex Jones ‘American Scholars Symposium’ in Los Angeles in June 2006. “We are here today to effect a change. We are here today to ask those still sleeping to wake up and join us”, Sheen told the sold out crowd of 1200. He continued “we are here today to present a case forged in science at the bedrock and common sense in it’s foundation…We are here today to fuel the deconstruction of the official myth. We are also here today to honor the victims and the families of 9/11. We’re here today for our children. As well as their children.” You can watch this speech in it’s entirety below. Alex Jones later came onstage and thanked Charlie, crediting him with the idea of having a truth convergence in Los Angeles.

Sheen seems to have inherited the conviction and passion for justice from his father Martin, who shared his perspective in a 2003 interview: “I went to my first demonstration as an activist and was arrested with Fr. Dan Berrigan. But it’s not just going to a place and objecting to something and getting arrested. It’s a deeply spiritual experience. You do it non- violently. You do it inclusively. It’s a spiritual thing; I can’t separate it from my (Catholic) faith”. He continued, “I love my country enough to risk its’ wrath by drawing attention to the negative things we don’t always want to see; and that can be risky and you have to pay for that, but It’s just like being a parent. If you’re always, you know, complimenting your children and never recognizing their faults, then they won’t grow, and they’re gonna get mad at you later and say ‘why didnt you tell me I was on the wrong path when I was’. Ya know, that’s they way; I love my country that much.”

The two day event in 2006 was aired in part on CSPAN and featured a panel of experts includingBYU Physics Professor Dr. Steven Jones, historian and author Webster Tarpley, and Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force(ret)., Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter.

Continued at the Examiner

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

The Sheen Family Going After President Bush as Well as President Obama

Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory: 9/11 Episode exposes ‘found’ black boxes

Mark Dice Proves People Are Stupid, Again! People sign petition to “increase inflation to 100%” to cause hyperinflation

Osama bin Laden’s missing family found in secret compound in Iran

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

Clockwise from top left: Osama Bin Laden and his 10-year-old son Ali; Saad bin Laden; Omar Ossama bin Laden with his wife Zaina; Ossman bin Laden; and Mohammad and Bakr bin Laden

Clockwise from top left: Osama Bin Laden and his 10-year-old son Ali; Saad bin Laden; Omar Ossama bin Laden with his wife Zaina; Ossman bin Laden; and Muhammad and Bakr bin Laden

Osama bin Laden’s closest relatives are living in a secret compound in Iran, members of the family said last night. They include a wife and children who disappeared from his Afghan camp at the time of the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

There has been uncertainty about the family’s whereabouts for the past eight years, with reports that some of the children had been killed in bombings, while others had joined their father in planning terrorist attacks. However, relatives said that they found out last month that the group, including one of Osama’s wives, six of his children and 11 of his grandchildren, had been kept in a high-security compound outside Tehran.

They have been prevented from contacting the outside world while Iran has repeatedly denied that any of the relatives were living in the country.

Members of the bin Laden family are now appealing for the group to be allowed to leave Iran and described them as the “forgotten victims of 9/11”.

Omar Ossama bin Laden, 29, the al-Qaeda leader’s fourth-eldest son, said he had no idea that his brothers and sisters were still alive until they called him in November. They told him how they had fled Afghanistan just before the 9/11 attacks and walked to the Iranian border. They were taken to a walled compound outside Tehran where guards said they were not allowed to leave “for their own safety”. The eldest of the children, Saad, was 20 at the time, Ossman 17, Muhammad 15, Fatma 14, Hamza 12, Iman 9, and Bakr, 7.

There had been speculation that Muhammad was second in command of al-Qaeda and that Saad also instigated and plotted terrorist attacks until he was killed about 18 months ago by an American drone. The relatives, however, said that Muhammad is still living in the compound and that Saad ran away less than a year ago in an attempt to find his mother.

A week after making contact with her brother, Iman escaped during a rare trip outside the compound and made her way to the Saudi Arabian Embassy. She is now living there while seeking permission to leave Iran.

Mr bin Laden said that his relatives live as normal a life as possible, cooking meals, watching television and reading. They are allowed out only rarely for shopping trips. As a number of families are being held in the compound some of the older siblings have been able to marry and have their own children. “The Iranian Government did not know what to do with this large group of people that nobody else wanted, so they just kept them safe. For that we owe them much gratitude, and thank Iran from the depth of our heart,” he said.

Mr bin Laden, who had lived with his father in exile in Sudan and Afghanistan but left before the 9/11 attacks, now hopes that the family will be given permission to leave Iran and join his mother, brother and two sisters in Syria, or himself and his wife in Qatar.

He said: “They are all just innocent victims, just the same as anyone else hurt by the dreadful events of 9/11 and 7/7. These babies and children have never had any education, never hurt a single soul, never trained with any weapons or ever been part of al-Qaeda. We just want to be together as a family. I have now got 11 nieces and nephews, born either in Afghanistan or Iran that I have never seen.

“Some may find this story unnerving, but the child can’t be judged by the sins of their father.”

Source: Times Online

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. Part 3: Osama bin Laden

Why The U.S. Missed Zapping Bin Laden 11 Years Ago

Former FBI Translator: Bin Laden Worked for U.S. Right Up Until 9/11

The 90-Minute Stand Down on 9/11: Why Was the Secret Service’s Early Request for Fighter Jets Ignored?

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Shortly after the second World Trade Center tower was hit, at 9:03 a.m. on September 11, 2001, an officer at Andrews Air Force Base, just outside Washington, DC, was notified that the Secret Service wanted fighter jets launched over the nation’s capital. It was now obvious the U.S. was under terrorist attack, and Washington would have been an obvious potential target. And yet the Secret Service’s request came to nothing.

No fighters had taken off from Andrews by 9:37 a.m., when the Pentagon was hit. Nor had any launched by the time Flight 93 apparently crashed in Pennsylvania, shortly after 10:00 a.m., while flying toward Washington. In fact, fighters did not launch from Andrews until over 90 minutes after the second attack in New York. The first fully armed fighters did not launch from there until more than two hours after that attack. So why was the Secret Service’s early request for help not acted upon? Why did fighter jets only take off from this massive Air Force base to defend the capital well after the morning’s attacks had ended?

SECRET SERVICE CALLS FAA HEADQUARTERS
The Secret Service agent who made the early request that fighter jets be launched appears to have been Nelson Garabito. Garabito was responsible for coordinating the president’s movements, and was also the Secret Service’s liaison to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). He was in the Secret Service Joint Operations Center (JOC) at the White House that morning. Just after Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower at 9:03 a.m., Garabito called Terry Van Steenbergen, his counterpart at the FAA, who was at the FAA headquarters in Washington. According to the 9/11 Commission, shortly into the call, Van Steenburgen told Garabito “that there were more planes unaccounted for–possibly hijacked–in addition to the two that had already crashed.”

Possibly in response to this information, Garabito appears to have asked Van Steenbergen to arrange for fighters to be launched over Washington. Van Steenbergen asked three of his colleagues at the FAA to call various air bases to see if they could get fighters into the air. One of these colleagues, Karen Pontius, had previously worked at Andrews Air Force Base, so she made the call to the FAA air traffic control tower there. [1] Garabito would have been unable to call the tower himself, because, according to a 9/11 Commission memorandum, the Secret Service “did not have a phone line to the Andrews tower.”

FAA HEADQUARTERS REQUESTS FIGHTERS
Pontius spoke to Steve Marra, an air traffic controller in the Andrews tower. Marra has recalled that Pontius “told him to launch F-16s to cap the airspace over Washington.” He relayed this information to the District of Columbia Air National Guard (DCANG), which is based at Andrews, across the airfield from the control tower. [2] Marra appears to have done so when DCANG officer Major Daniel Caine phoned the tower and asked if any air traffic control measures were being implemented in response to the attacks. [3] Caine later recalled that the tower controller–i.e. Marra–told him “that they just received the scramble order.” However, oddly, Caine told the 9/11 Commission that the Andrews tower “would not have been in the loop for any Secret Service orders to scramble aircraft.” [4]

If the DC Air National Guard was notified of this early “scramble order,” why was that order not acted upon? Pilots and others working for the DCANG at Andrews were already well aware of the crisis taking place. Upon learning of the second crash, someone at the unit reportedly yelled, “We’re under a terrorist attack!” [5] And, seeing the television coverage of the burning WTC towers, an officer exclaimed, “Well, holy shit, if this is a terrorist attack, we need to get something in the air!”

Furthermore, a request from the Secret Service should have carried considerable weight. According to author Lynn Spencer, “Given that the Secret Service provides protection to the president–and that the president, and the vice president when the president is not available, is the ultimate commander in chief of the military–the Secret Service also has certain authority over the military and, in this case, the DC Guard.” [6]

CAINE CALLS HIS SECRET SERVICE CONTACT
After his call to the control tower, Daniel Caine called his contact at the Secret Service, Kenneth Beauchamp, who was at the White House JOC. Caine later told the 9/11 Commission that, on reflection, he believed it was his hearing that the tower had received the “scramble order” that prompted him to call Beauchamp. [7]

And yet Beauchamp supposedly contradicted the Secret Service’s request for fighters. Even though it was obvious that the U.S. was under attack, and it should have been clear that Washington was a likely target for any further attacks, he said the Secret Service did not require assistance from the DCANG. Caine had asked: “Do you have any additional information? Are you guys going to need some help?” and Beauchamp replied, “No, but I’ll call you back if that changes.” [8]

Caine has said that during this call, which he described as “a very quick, confusing conversation,” Beauchamp told him that “things were happening and he’d call me back.” [9] However, Beauchamp did not call Caine back. [10] (Another Secret Service agent, though, did subsequently call Caine, and asked about getting fighters launched. [11])

According to Lieutenant Colonel Marc Sasseville, the acting operations group commander under the 113th Wing of the DCANG, at the time Caine spoke to Beauchamp, “we weren’t thinking about defending anything. Our primary concern was what would happen to the air traffic system.” [12] But when Brigadier General David Wherley, the commander of the DC Air National Guard, subsequently called the Secret Service JOC shortly after the Pentagon was hit and spoke to Beauchamp, Beauchamp implored him to launch jets to protect Washington. Beauchamp said: “We want you to put a CAP [combat air patrol] up over the city. We need some fighters now.” [13]

DCANG PILOT ‘STANDING BACK, WAITING’
Between the second WTC attack at 9:03 a.m. and the Pentagon attack at 9:37 a.m., the DCANG fighter pilots on duty at Andrews appear to have been waiting around and doing very little, when they should have been hurrying to get airborne.

One of those pilots, Captain Brandon Rasmussen, was promptly informed of the second crash in New York after it occurred, and immediately realized its implications. He recalled: “I think everybody knew that this was a coordinated attack that was happening. We had no idea who it was by, but it was definitely intentional when you get two airplanes hitting both towers.” And yet, he said: “At that point, we didn’t know what we could possibly do; that’s New York City way up the road. So … like everybody else in America, we’re just standing by and watching the news.”

This is extraordinary! An Air Force base just 10 miles from Washington had learned that the nation was under attack. And yet the immediate response of its pilots was to stand around watching television!

Rasmussen said it was only after the news broke about the Pentagon being hit that “we knew that we were going to be sticking around home and being quite busy,” and “the squadron leadership went into action.” [14] DCANG commander David Wherley only headed across the base from his office to the fighter squadron building, to assist his unit’s response to the attacks, after a woman at his office saw on television that the Pentagon had been hit and started shrieking. [15]

But even after the Pentagon attack, the DCANG pilots were not immediately told to prepare for takeoff. Rasmussen recalled that at that point, “I’m just kind of standing back, waiting for somebody to task me with something.” He added, “I was just waiting at the ops desk for someone to say, ‘Okay, we’ve been cleared to take off and go.’” [16]

FIRST JET LAUNCHES AT 10:38
The first DCANG jet to take off from Andrews Air Force Base was an F-16 that had just returned from a training mission over North Carolina. It had little fuel remaining, carried no missiles, and had only practice ammunition. It took off at 10:38 a.m., an hour after the attack on the Pentagon. [17] Two more F-16s took off at 10:42 a.m., but these were also armed with only practice ammunition and had no missiles. [18] At 11:11 a.m., Rasmussen and Daniel Caine took off in their F-16s, the first fighters to launch from Andrews armed with missiles as well as bullets. [19] By that time, the attacks were long over.

Rasmussen has expressed his and the other DCANG pilots’ frustration at having to wait around before being allowed to get airborne. He said that when his unit finally received authorization for its jets to take off, “We were relieved to actually be given permission to go up and do something, instead of feeling totally helpless. I mean, we are fighter pilots, just like guard dogs chomping at the bit, ready to go.” [20]

DCANG PROVIDES ‘CAPABLE AND READY RESPONSE FORCES’
Although the DC Air National Guard was not part of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) air defense force, its mission at the time of the 9/11 attacks included providing “capable and ready response forces for the District of Columbia in the event of a natural disaster or civil emergency.” Lieutenant Colonel Phil Thompson, the chief of safety for the DCANG, said, “We practice scrambles, we know how to do intercepts and other things.” [21] The unit was in fact known as the “Capital Guardians,” implying that it was responsible for protecting Washington, DC. [22]

The fact that, in spite of an early request for help from the Secret Service, it took the DC Air National Guard so long to put together a response to the attacks should be of concern to all Americans. The unit’s disastrously slow emergency response needs to be thoroughly probed as part of a rigorous new investigation of the 9/11 attacks.

NOTES
[1] “USSS Statements and Interview Reports.” 9/11 Commission, July 28, 2003; 9/11 Commission, The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Authorized Edition) . New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2004, pp. 464-465; “Memorandum for the Record: Interview With Terry Van Steenbergen.” 9/11 Commission, March 30, 2004.
[2] “Memorandum for the Record: Visit to Reagan National Airport Control Tower in Alexandria, VA and Andrews Air Force Base Control Tower.” 9/11 Commission, July 28, 2003.
[3] Leslie Filson, Air War Over America: Sept. 11 Alters Face of Air Defense Mission. Tyndall Air Force Base, FL: 1st Air Force, 2003, p. 76.
[4] “Memorandum for the Record: Interview With Major John Daniel Caine, USAF, Supervisor of Flying at 121st Squadron, 113th Wing, Andrews Air Force Base on September 11, 2001.” 9/11 Commission, March 8, 2004.
[5] Steve Vogel, “Flights of Vigilance Over the Capital.” Washington Post, April 8, 2002.
[6] Lynn Spencer, Touching History: The Untold Story of the Drama That Unfolded in the Skies Over America on 9/11. New York: Free Press, 2008, p. 123.
[7] “Memorandum for the Record: Interview With Major John Daniel Caine.”
[8] Lynn Spencer, Touching History, p. 124.
[9] Leslie Filson, Air War Over America, p. 76.
[10] “Memorandum for the Record: Interview With Major John Daniel Caine.”
[11] Leslie Filson, Air War Over America, p. 78.
[12] William B. Scott, “F-16 Pilots Considered Ramming Flight 93.” Aviation Week & Space Technology, September 9, 2002.
[13] “Memorandum for the Record: BG David Wherley, on September 11, 2001, Commander of the 113th Wing of the USAF Air National Guard, Andrews AFB.” 9/11 Commission, August 28, 2003; Lynn Spencer, Touching History, pp. 184-185.
[14] Brandon Rasmussen, interviewed by Leslie Filson, September 18, 2003.
[15] Steve Vogel, “Flights of Vigilance Over the Capital”; Steve Vogel, The Pentagon: A History. New York: Random House, 2007, pp. 445-446; Lynn Spencer,Touching History, p. 184.
[16] Brandon Rasmussen, interviewed by Leslie Filson.
[17] Steve Vogel, “Flights of Vigilance Over the Capital”; William B. Scott, “F-16 Pilots Considered Ramming Flight 93″“UA93 and Andrews Timeline.” 9/11 Commission, n.d.
[18] William B. Scott, “F-16 Pilots Considered Ramming Flight 93″; Leslie Filson, Air War Over America, p. 82; Brandon Rasmussen, interviewed by Leslie Filson.
[19] Leslie Filson, Air War Over America, p. 84; “Relevant Andrews Transmissions.” 9/11 Commission, February 17-18, 2004.
[20] Brandon Rasmussen, interviewed by Leslie Filson.
[21] “Andrews Air Force Base: Partner Units.” DCMilitary.com, Summer 2001William B. Scott, “F-16 Pilots Considered Ramming Flight 93″; Leslie Filson, Air War Over America, p. 76

[22] Lynn Spencer, Touching History, p. 122.

Source: 911 Blogger

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9 /11 Truth Movement

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon

Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory: 9/11 Episode exposes ‘found’ black boxes