Days after the U.S. government announced upcoming trials for an H1N1 flu vaccine, Saint Louis University has been inundated with phone calls and e-mails from people volunteering for the study.

The university’s Center for Vaccine Development has received more than 500 responses from potential volunteers since Wednesday, when the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced human trials for a swine flu vaccine would begin in early August.

“This response has been exceptionally strong,” Nancy Solomon, a spokeswoman for the university’s medical center, told CNN Radio. “We haven’t had that strong of a response to our call for volunteers since we conducted our small pox vaccine research after September 11.”

Thousands of Americans are currently being recruited for swine flu vaccine testing at several research centers across the country, including Saint Louis University’s Center for Vaccine Development.

“The federal government comes to us when they need a quick response to test the safety and efficacy of vaccines,” Solomon said.

Other trial sites include the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore; Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas; Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center; Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia; Group Health Cooperative in Seattle, Washington; The University of Iowa in Iowa City; and Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee.

They will be joined by Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri; Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina; and IPS Research in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Most of the human trials are being funded by the National Institutes of Health.

In an effort to deliver the vaccine to those who will need it most by October, the clinical trials will enroll as many as 1,000 adults and children, according to officials at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a division of the NIH, which will lead the effort.

The trials will measure the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.

The research is a first step toward U.S. health officials’ goal of developing a safe and effective vaccine against H1N1, also known as swine flu, which has been declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization.

After careful screening, volunteers will be inoculated and asked to keep a diary on how they feel. After eight days their blood will be checked. After 21 days they will receive another dose, followed again by diary logs and blood tests.

Patients will be monitored two months for safety issues, followed by a four-month and six-month checkup.

“The purpose of these trials is always to make sure they are safe,” said Dr. Karen Kotloff, professor of pediatrics and lead investigator and researcher at Maryland’s Center for Vaccine Development. “But even after six weeks, if things look good, we’re pretty sure the vaccine will work.”

At last count, the CDC said there are 43,771 H1N1 reported cases in the U.S., along with 302 deaths that have been linked to the illness.

In a normal flu season, about 36,000 Americans die from influenza and related complications.

Models predict the 2009 H1N1 flu will peak in October, with many cases being diagnosed in September, according to Dr. Robert Belshe, director of Saint Louis University’s Center for Vaccine Development.

“We’ll be in the midst of it before we know it,” Belshe said.

Swine flu could sicken one in five people this fall, and Belshe said he worries that the number of serious health complications and deaths as a result of the H1N1 virus could soar.

“It’s looking more and more like we’re going to have a big flu outbreak this fall as soon as the kids get back to school,” Belshe told CNN Radio.

“Influenza is unpredictable, but I believe this pandemic will hit pre-teens, teens and their parents hard, and as many as 60 million Americans could be sick with the flu. It’s critical that we find a way to protect people from this disease.”

Source: CNN

A must watch video from CBS 60 mins

Vaccine Expert Reveals What You Should Know Before You Roll Up Your Sleeve

12,000 U.S. Children To Be Swine Flu Vaccine Guinea Pigs

Legal Immunity Set For Swine Flu Vaccine Makers

Deadly Baghdad clash underscores rift over interpretation of U.S.-Iraq deal

ABU GHRAIB, Iraq – When insurgents attacked an American convoy with AK-47 rounds and a couple of grenades on a dusty highway in a Baghdad suburb this week, U.S. soldiers returned fire, chased the suspects through narrow alleyways and raided houses.

Tuesday’s clash killed two Iraqi adults and a 14-year-old and wounded four people, including two children.

When the shooting subsided, another confrontation began. A senior Iraqi army commander who arrived at the scene concluded that the Americans had fired indiscriminately at civilians and ordered his men to take the U.S. soldiers into custody. The U.S. military said the soldiers had acted in self-defense and had sought to avoid civilian casualties; U.S. commanders at the scene persuaded the Iraqis to back down.

The incident, apparently the first time a senior Iraqi commander has sought to detain U.S. soldiers, signals a potential escalation of tensions between U.S. and Iraqi forces trying to find a new equilibrium as Iraq assumes more responsibility for its security.

Friction
Both sides have starkly different interpretations of vaguely worded restrictions on the authority and movement of U.S. forces that went into effect more than three weeks ago. Those differences, and the friction they are causing in U.S.-Iraqi military relations, have been sharply underscored by the Abu Ghraib attack, which appears to be the first time U.S. soldiers have used deadly force since the new restrictions were imposed.

Word of the incident quickly spread among U.S. soldiers in Baghdad. Several said it heightened concerns that the split-second decisions they make now have the potential to draw a sharp rebuke from Iraq’s increasingly assertive security forces. And reaction from Iraqi military officials seemed to confirm those fears.

“What happened is a crime,” the Iraqi commander said Friday during a brief interview in his office. “Civilians were killed.”

The commander and a senior Iraqi police official, who also characterized the American response as a “crime,” spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing ministry regulations that bar them from speaking to the news media without written approval.

Maj. David Shoupe, a U.S. military spokesman, said the two slain men were assailants.

“The response of the [U.S.] patrol was within the rules of engagement, appropriate and proportionate to the attack on them,” Shoupe said in an e-mail. “It is important to note that the patrol used aimed fire to kill their two attackers — stopping the attack that could have resulted in many more [U.S.] and Iraqi deaths.”

Hospital and police officials said the two wounded children were 9 and 12.

Conflicting accounts of attacks involving U.S. forces in Iraq are common, and versions are often skewed by how the troops are viewed in the area.

‘They shot randomly’
Interviews with residents, hospital officials and Iraqi army police commanders in the suburb of Abu Ghraib suggest that conventional wisdom holds the Americans killed civilians.

Many in this former insurgent hotbed are seething.

“They shot randomly,” said Hussein Neda, 47, the father of one of the slain men. “They were running with weapons, and they killed my son before we got to him.”

Neda’s 9-year-old son, Sufian, said he was wounded when a bullet grazed his left shoulder.

“I hate the Americans,” the boy said quietly. “I never liked them, even before this happened.”

Sami al-Fahad, a doctor, was on duty at Abu Ghraib Hospital on Tuesday when the victims of the crossfire arrived.

“This is an old habit of the U.S. Army,” he said nonchalantly, sitting behind a desk as he checked a man’s blood pressure. “They kill the people in the street, even if they are civilians or children.”

As the wounded were being treated, the father of one of the victims, awaiting news of his son, began chanting “tha’ar, tha’ar,” which means revenge in Arabic.

A few months ago, such an incident probably would not have been more than a footnote in this six-year-old war with no front lines, in which U.S. troops have had to fend off hundreds of attacks in crowded areas, where discerning between assailants and bystanders is sometimes impossible.

But because the conduct of American troops increasingly is viewed through a political prism here, and because Iraqi and U.S. officials remain at odds over how the security agreement should be applied in urban areas, commanders from both countries are closely reviewing the incident and its ripple effects.

In recent days, Iraqis have questioned American soldiers at checkpoints in Baghdad, at times preventing them from driving into neighborhoods. In one incident, an Iraqi soldier drew a weapon on a U.S. armored vehicle, American officials said.

Senior U.S. commanders have played down the tension, saying that the relationship remains fundamentally strong and that “hiccups” are to be expected at a time of transition. But soldiers and junior commanders called the situation alarming.

“I worry that an Iraqi army soldier will shoot at my truck with his 20 AK-47 rounds and my gunner will shoot back with his 100 50-caliber rounds instead of ducking down,” a U.S. officer said on the condition of anonymity.

Another officer said U.S. soldiers have been taken aback by the sudden intransigence of their Iraqi partners.

‘Innocent’ victims
The Iraqi army seems “more and more willing to conduct operations on their own and less willing to accept our operational guidance,” said the officer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “But they continue to look to [us] for support. Their independence is like a 16-year-old who just got his license and doesn’t want to listen anymore but still wants you to pay for the gas and the insurance and bail them out of jail” when they mess up.

The police major overseeing the Iraqi investigation into the incident said he knows who the real culprits are  —and intends to arrest them soon.

“All the ones who were shot are innocent,” he said, sitting on a sofa in his office while smoking a cigarette.

He said he holds no ill will toward the Americans and appreciates the training and support they have given Iraq’s security forces. But he said he does not want his men going on missions with U.S. forces.

“We don’t need them,” he said. After a pause, he added: “except for fuel.”

Source: MSNBC

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

If you thought the end of American intervention in foreign wars was nearing, think again

Soldier balks at deploying; says Obama isn’t president

Veteran Flies Flag Upside Down, Gets Harassed by Cops

Using emissions-free solar panels to power one’s home may help save the planet, but having access to traditional fossil-fuel generated backup electrical power isn’t free.

Xcel Energy is proposing a rate increase for solar customers that the state’s largest power supplier said pays for providing electricity in case those homes need it.

Xcel is proposing a 2.6 cents per kilowatt hour fee based on the generating capacity of a home’s solar panels. The proposed fee would be along with actual electricity used and a $7 to $8 service fee now charged to cover meter reading and billing.

The Public Utilities Commission will hold a hearing on Xcel’s new fee on Aug. 5.

Members of the solar panel industry oppose the fee.

Source: KKTV

Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs

Government using fear to consolidate power, spend money

Senate Moves To Block FED Audit

With ‘Cap and Trade’ We All May Need ‘Nationalized Health Care’ Because We’re Sick Of Washington!