Sotomayor on the Supreme Court: A Gun-grabber’s Dream Come True
Obama Supreme Court pick Sonia Sotomayor believes that suspects captured on the battlefield must receive all rights afforded to American citizens under the Constitution. That’s the good news. Now here’s the bad. She thinks American citizens don’t have the right to own firearms.
As a graduate student at Princeton University, Sotomayor wrote a these entitled “Deadly Obsession: American Gun Culture.” In the text, Sotomayor makes the argument that the Second Amendment does not actually afford individual citizens the right to bear arms. She believes only the military has this right. According to Sotomayor, it has been illegal for individuals to own firearms since the passing of the Bill of Rights.
In 2004, in U.S. v. Sanchez-Villar, a three-judge panel that included Sotomayor wrote that “the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.” In another case, Sotomayor ruled that it is illegal for citizens to keep nunchakus in their homes.
Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, said on Wednesday that “Judge Sotomayor’s position on the Second Amendment is a clear signal that Mr. Obama’s claim that he supports gun rights is nothing but lip service,” reports CBS News.
“Judge Sotomayor’s record suggests hostility, rather than empathy, for the tens of millions of Americans who exercise their right to keep and bear arms,” said Dave Kopel of the Independence Institute.
Ken Blackwell of the Family Research Council believes her nomination amounts to “a declaration of war against America’s gun owners.”
Earlier this year, Sotomayor ruled that states do not have to obey the Second Amendment’s commandment that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, according to CNSNews. In Maloney v. Cuomo, Sotomayor signed an opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that said the Second Amendment does not protect individuals from having their right to keep and bear arms restricted by state governments.
Sonia Sotomayor would be a perfect Supreme Court justice for the Obama administration. Obama the supposed constitutional scholar is a notorious gun-grabber, although the corporate media refuses to underscore this fact. He endorsed the unconstitutional Illinois gun ban. In classic doublethink fashion, he has declared support for the Second Amendment in principle but backed local gun bans. Obama wants to ban “all forms” of semi-autos. But it is not simply semi-automatics — he would even ban most common rimfire target pistols, including those used in Olympic competition. For more on Obama’s gun-grabbing philosophy, see Barak Obama’s Gun Control Positions.
Many Americans understand Obama wants to outlaw guns and in response they are purchasing guns and ammo in record numbers. “Gun sales are on the rise across the U.S. and many dealers are having trouble keeping guns and ammunition in stock. Sales of guns moved sharply upward last November, the same month voters chose a new president,” reports VOA News.
A growing number of states understand the federal government is gearing up to not only outlaw firearms and trash the Second Amendment, but possibly confiscate them as well.
For instance, Tennessee governor Phil Bredesen has promised to sign a bill today making it legal to possess a firearm during martial law. “Sponsors say martial rule is the same as martial law at the federal level. They say the law is necessary after law enforcement in New Orleans went door to door seizing weapons in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina,” reports the Associated Press.
Source: InfoWars
Other stories at We Are Change Colorado Springs
June 14th, 2009 at 8:51 am
[...] Sotomayor on the Supreme Court: A Gun-grabber’s Dream Come True [...]
June 24th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Tell that latina, socialist, whore Molan Labe’, Come and get them bitch! I dare you.
June 29th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
suspects captured on the battlefield must receive all rights afforded to American citizens under the Constitution.
I don’t agree with this, Constitutional rights should only apply to U.S. citizens. The enemy should receive no more that the Geneva convention affords them.
The battlefield is a place to kill the enemy. I believe the enemy should be killed and should only be captured for interrogation to extract information that will save our soldiers and advance our efforts to win.
War is not a game where you slap me and I slap you, No you kill me or I kill you, end of story, if this is not acceptable than lets not have war.
August 18th, 2009 at 9:35 pm
Obama and sotomayor are total idiots and empty suites. I’ve got news for them. Any one that comes to my house demanding my guns will be SHOT.
August 30th, 2009 at 9:16 am
Wow, I cannot believe Sotomayor – why in the world would we give rights to people who have attempted to kill American soldiers? Then take all the weapons away from good upstanding citizens who get them through the correct process. I am an MP stationed in Afghanistan and I am very upset by the thought that anyone would want Sotomayor as a US Justice – she does not stand for what is right in America. The next thing you know Sotomayor will say that these detainees need to live in the US because no one else wants them – I say let them live with her and when they get guns illegally then she can figure out what they would do next.
OUTRAGED in Afganistan!!
September 8th, 2009 at 10:37 am
well it must be up to us good citizens to defend our Second Amendment Rights…Peacefully via the courts but if that should fail, by force or arms.